Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 FSUPP 782 - Knipp v. Weikle

Knipp v. Weikle’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1991

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

70197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Moor v. County of Alameda · Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. · Johnson v. Glick · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court has consistently held that the doctrine of respondeat superior is inapplicable and actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Therefore, absent an allegation that a named-defendant has personally subjected the plaintiff to a deprivation of his constitutional rights or has caused the conduct complained of or participated in some manner in the allegedly unlawful actions of his employee or subordinate officer, this Court has held a complaint insufficient to state a claim against such defendant under § 1983. (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The sheriff shall be responsible for the neglect of duty or misconduct in office of each of his deputies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.