Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 PA 210 - Commonwealth v. Tyrrell

Commonwealth v. Tyrrell’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Commonwealth v. O'SEARO (1976), Commonwealth v. Walzack (1976)

73 state decisions

440196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Kloiber · State v. Lucas · Commonwealth v. Kravitz · Commonwealth v. Bolish · Commonwealth v. Novak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All murder which shall be perpetrated by means of poison, or by lying in wait, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate and premeditated killing, or which shall be committed in the perpetration of, or attempting to perpetrate any arson, rape, robbery, burglary, or kidnapping, shall be murder in the first degree. All other kinds of murder shall be murder in the second degree. . . .” Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 701, formerly 18 P.S. § 4701. 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As a result Dr. Coleman determined that the defendant was psychotic since teen age [*] and that he was so emotionally upset on March 7, 1960, that `he would react to an impulse to pick up a loaded shotgun resting at his elbow and fire it at his wife, and that at that time he had no intent to take his wife's life.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.