Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 SC 225 - State v. Beekman

State v. Beekman’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lyle · State v. Hoffman · State v. McKnight · State v. Johnson · State v. Freiburger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cumulative error doctrine provides relief to a party when a combination of errors, insignificant by themselves, has the effect of preventing the party from receiving a fair trial, and the cumulative effect of the errors affects the outcome of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellant must demonstrate more than error in order to qualify for reversal pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine; rather, he must show the errors adversely affected his right to a fair trial to qualify for reversal on this ground.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.