Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 SC 247 - State v. Dial

State v. Dial’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 564 · 28 U.S.C. § 566

Relies on State v. Wilson · State v. Quattlebaum · State v. Beckham · State v. Hamilton · State v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial [court's] decision regarding the comparative probative value and prejudicial effect of relevant evidence should be reversed only in exceptional circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.