Kickasola v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 90 So. 2d 629 - Davis v. State · Frank v. State · 179 So. 2d 873 - Spataro v. State · 395 So. 2d 492 - Peek v. State · Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Deadwyler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he law is clear that one is not guilty of possession [of a controlled substance] by virtue of aiding and abetting [a confederate in] a sale [of such substance].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“of a controlled substance, for purposes of the above statute, when he has knowledge of the illicit presence of such substance, coupled with the ability to maintain control over it or to reduce it to his physical possession, even though he does not have actual personal dominion over same. [3]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is unlawful for any person to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.