Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

405 So. 2d 260

Macks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 1981

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1981-10-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1982

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The sentence under review, which was imposed upon probation revocation, is here*261by affirmed. We are unable to discern whether appellant served any time in jail pursuant to his sentence on the second count of grand theft. If he served any time in addition to the year served on the first count, appellant should receive credit to be deducted from his current four-year sentence. The cause is accordingly remanded for the trial judge to determine whether appellant actually served any jail time pursuant to the split sentence given for the second count of grand theft. Any credit given the appellant must be for a specific period of time and shall be provided for in the sentence, Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1979).

¶2Affirmed in part, and remanded for appropriate action consistent with this opinion.

SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
/405/so2d/260 · .json · Public domain