405 So. 2d 283 - DeArce v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2013
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Garcia · United States v. Armedo-Sarmiento · United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stansbury · 366 So. 2d 462 - Andrews v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is the trial court's duty to insure that the defendant fully understands the disabilities [a] conflict places on his defense and the adverse consequences that may result from such representation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Winokur v. State · Alexis v. State“In a criminal case, the existence of a conflict of interest is not determinative because the defendant has a constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel of his choice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.