Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 So. 2d 708 - Ex Parte Hilley

405 So. 2d 708 - Ex Parte Hilley’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2023

17 state decisions

9019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skipper v. Skipper · 79 Wash. 2d 810 - Munoz v. Munoz · Compton v. Gilmore · Clift v. Clift · 15 Ariz. App. 64 - Stapley v. Stapley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In none of the cited cases did the orders prohibit the parents from themselves following and/or engaging in the beliefs and practices of their chosen religion. The orders merely prohibited the parents from binding the children to their particular beliefs or practices when they threatened the health or welfare of the children. The order in the present case, however, goes beyond that. It effectively restricts [the mother's] free exercise of her chosen religion by providing that `she will curtail all activities that require her to be away from the children....' Thus, [the mother] is not free to attend church or other church related activities during that time when the children are out of school because the order does not permit her to leave the children in the care of a babysitter or other suitable attendant. "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus, the rule appears to be well established that the courts should maintain an attitude of strict impartiality between religions and should not disqualify any applicant for custody or restrain any person having custody or visitation rights from tak ing the children to a particular church, except where there is a clear and affirmative showing that the conflicting religious beliefs affect the general welfare of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"`That during the time that the children are in the care, custody, and control of [the mother], she will curtail all activities that require her to be away from the children, or requires the children to travel from the home during the week except for one church function of reasonable duration and normal school and social functions in which the children may become involved.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.