Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 So. 2d 76 - Jolly v. State

405 So. 2d 76 - Jolly v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 425 So. 2d 500 - Gwin v. State (1982), 597 So. 2d 734 - Owens v. State (1992)

45 state decisions

1301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 29 Ala. App. 349 - Wilkins v. State · 29 Ala. App. 399 - Robertson v. State · Bryson v. State · 344 So. 2d 1239 - Smith v. State · 364 So. 2d 374 - Merriweather v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the record is silent on appeal, it will be presumed that what ought to have been done was not only done, but rightly done.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence *Page 155 in the case and proper to go before the jury in its deliberations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Where real or demonstrative evidence has not been formally introduced in evidence, the fact that it has been used in connection with the giving of testimony makes it evidence in the case and proper to go before the jury in its deliberations. Smith v. State , 344 So.2d 1239 , 1241 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Smith , 344 So.2d 1243 (Ala. 1977); C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence , Section 123.01(6) (3rd ed. 1977). "The negative conveyed no information that had not been emphatically conveyed to the jury during the trial. The officer's testimony on what the negative depicted was clear and unequivocal. Under these circumstances, we fail to see how the admission and viewing of the negative prejudiced the defendant. Merriweather v. State , 364 So.2d 374 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Merriweather , 364 So.2d 477 (Ala. 1978)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.