405 So. 2d 986 - Cantrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Whalen v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · Jeffers v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court of the United States having ruled in Albernaz v. United States [ 450 U.S. 333 , 101 S.Ct. 1137 , 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981)], that the imposition of consecutive sentences for violation in one criminal transaction of two separate statutes is not precluded by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, does the Supreme Court of Florida desire to adopt the same construction or a more restrictive construction to Article I, Section 9, of the Florida Constitution?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cantrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.