Medallion Stores, Inc. v. Eidt’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2003
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bigham · Smith v. Henger · Houston National Bank v. Adair · Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc. · Baumler v. Hazelwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Knew or by the exercise of reasonable care would have discovered the condition, and should have realized that it involved an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees. 2. And should have expected that their invitees would not discover or realize the danger, or would fail to protect themselves against it. 3. And failed to exercise reasonable care to protect their invitees against the danger.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.