Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 WIS2D 654 - State v. Oscar C. Thomas

State v. Oscar C. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Confrontation Clause only prohibits the introduction of testimonial hearsay, and hearsay is, by definition, an out of court statement that is 'offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the guilty verdict actually rendered in this trial was surely unattributable to the error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.