In Re Waring’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 107 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Orion Pictures Corporation Video Software Dealers Association v. Orion Pictures Corp · Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Named Under Seal (In Re Phar-Mor, Inc.) · In Re Fibermark, Inc. · In Re Alterra Healthcare Corp. · In Re Waring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“information that is so critical to an entity's operations that disclosing the information will unfairly benefit that entity's competitors”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Thomas“has the burden of proving that the information should be protected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Thomas“must reasonably be expected to cause commercial injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.