Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 F.2d 1095 - Samora v. United States

Samora v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

406 F.2d 1095 · 1969

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
August 2011
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably United States v. Ajlouny (1980), United States v. Ortiz-Loya (1985)

41 federal appellate · 2 district ·

230196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 22 U.S.C. § 1934 · 22 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 1 of the Espionage Act of 1917) · 49 U.S.C. § 322

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Yakus v. United States · Zemel v. Rusk · United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who willfully violates any provision of this section ... or any rule or regulation issued under [this] section ... shall [be guilty of an offense against the United States].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e need not consider other grounds on which the government claims the search was valid”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “were entitled to detain the car, make a reasonable search and seize the arms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.