Purcell v. Keane’s Empirical Analysis
406 F.2d 1195 · 1969
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2002 · most notably Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. Antal (1972), Loretangeli v. Critelli (1988)
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 482 · 29 U.S.C. § 501 · 29 U.S.C. § 529
Relies on Graves v. United States · Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Viscardi v. United States · Oyler v. Adams · Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No labor organization shall limit the right of any member thereof to institute an ac tion in any court, ... Provided that any such member may be required to exhaust reasonable hearing procedures (but not to exceed a four-month lapse of time) -within such organization, before instituting legal or administrative proceedings against such organization or any officer thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ . . . the labor organization or its governing board of officers refuse to fail to sue or 1 recover damages or secure an accounting or other appropriate relief within a reasonable time after being requested to do so by any member of the labor organization . . . "”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.