Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

406 F.2d 528

Docket No. 12438.

United States v. Young

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 3, 1969.

Decided Feb. 7, 1969.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-02-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1970

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on Estep v. United States · Blalock v. United States · United States v. Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1969-02-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1O. W. Clayton, Charlotte, N. C. (Court-appointed counsel) [Clayton, Lane & Helms, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief] for appellant.

¶2Joseph R. Cruciani, Asst. U. S. Atty. (William Medford, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before BOREMAN, BRYAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Charles Robert Young appeals his conviction by the court on a charge of failing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. After having been classified as I-A and after being ordered to submit to induction he applied for a classification of I-O, Conscientious Objector, which application was denied.

¶6A decision of the Selective Service Board as to a registrant’s classification made in conformity with regulations may be overturned by the courts only if it clearly appears that there is no basis in fact for such classification. Upon careful examination of the record we cannot say that there is no basis in fact for the Board’s determination. Therefore, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.1

¶7Affirmed.

/406/f2d/528 · .json · Public domain