Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 F.2d 823 - Grose v. Cohen

Grose v. Cohen’s Empirical Analysis

406 F.2d 823 · 1969

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
7
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 9 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably City of Hackensack v. Winner (1980), Brinker v. Weinberger (1975)

42 federal appellate · 9 district · 9 state decisions

550196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins · United States v. Stone & Downer Co. · Cappadora v. Celebrezze · Hobby v. Hodges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n any event, when traditional concepts of res judicata do not work well, they should be relaxed or qualified to prevent injustice. 2 Davis, Administrative Law, Sec. 18.03 (1958).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “finding subject to being ... reopened provides an inappropriate bar to further adjudication if new evidence offered may result in a different determination.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not encrusted with the rigid finality that characterizes the precept in judicial proceedings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.