Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 F.3d 1052 - Moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc.

Moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

406 F.3d 1052 · 2005

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
3
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Ashley County v. Pfizer, Inc. (2009), Brown v. Medtronic, Inc. (2010)

29 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions

390200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Venture Associates Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation · Gibson v. Brewer · Moran v. Clarke · O'Dell v. Hercules Inc. · Carlon v. Thaman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “matters of public and administrative record referenced in the complaint.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A variation of fraudulent misrepresentation is fraudulent omission. Silence may amount to a representation, constituting the first element of fraudulent misrepresentation, if the party sought to be held accountable for fraud (1) conceals material facts and (2) has a legal duty to disclose such facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could not have relied on the press release in initially deciding to hire [defendant] because the press release was issued months after [defendant] and [plaintiff] had signed the letter of intent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.