Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

406 F.3d 1131

Docket Nos. 99-99031, 99-99032.

Visciotti v. Brown

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2005.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2005-05-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2016

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Woodford v. Visciotti

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Maria E. Stratton, Esq., William For-man, Statia Peakheart, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

¶2Meagan J. Beale, Esq., John T. Swan, DAG, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

¶3Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 123 S.Ct. 357, 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.

¶7IT IS SO ORDERED.

/406/f3d/1131 · .json · Public domain