Singh v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis
406 F.3d 191 · 2005
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Jarbough v. Attorney General of the United States (2007), Konan v. Attorney General of the United States (2005)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Sangha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Mohamed Abdille v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mode of analysis in asylum cases. Under that jurisprudence, an alien may be eligible for asylum even if the persecution he or she suffered, or fears suffering in the future, is only partially based on a ground enumerated in the Immigration & Nationality Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Gonzales“Khalista-ni” while he was waiting at a bus stop even before he became an AISSF member. 2 . Singh must show he is a person who is “unable or unwilling” to return to his country of origin”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Singh v. Gonzales“Persecution for `imputed' grounds ( e.g., where one is erroneously thought to hold particular political opinions . . . ) can satisfy the `refugee' definition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.