406 Ill. App. 3d 548 - People v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 66 Ill. 2d 551 - People v. King · 215 Ill. 2d 167 - People v. Herron · 102 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Krankel · 238 Ill. 2d 598 - People v. Thompson · 226 Ill. 2d 92 - People v. Wheeler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]efendant does not argue, nor does the record support, that he was prejudiced by the trial court's failure to individually ask prospective jurors whether they accepted the principle that in delivering a verdict they could not use against him defendant's decision not to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence that defendant failed to report the accident within one-half hour of the accident * * * [is] a required element to support a section 11-401(b) conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Eubanks“Motion for Appointment of Counsel Outside the Office of the Lake County Public Defender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.