Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 P.3d 860 - People v. Epps

People v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Garcia · People v. Palomo · Riboni v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST. · People v. C.V. · People ex rel. N.R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he motion [to disqualify] shall not be granted unless requested by the district attorney or unless the court finds that the district attorney has a personal or financial interest or special circumstances exist that would render it unlikely that the defendant would receive a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.