406 Pa. Super. 66 - Commonwealth v. Molino’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Rochin v. People of California · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Commonwealth v. Dugger · Poola v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [suppression c]ourt found that the circumstances surrounding the accident and subsequent police investigation would reasonably warrant a police officer to conclude that the [defendant was operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol---- The manner in which the defendant was found in and of itself indicated that he was driving the vehicle and that alcohol was present in, on or around the [defendant. Viewing the totality of the circum stances, this [suppression c]ourt is of the opinion that the results of the blood test were properly admissible as the test was not taken in violation of [the defendant's Constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.