Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 SO2D 1093 - State v. Brady

State v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2001

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

130198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Hester v. United States · Addington v. Texas · Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp. · 379 So. 2d 643 - Norman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the Hester opinion has not been overruled, subsequent opinions indicate that the open fields doctrine cannot be used as carte blanche for a warrantless search simply because the location searched is not part of a dwelling or its adjacent curtilage. As the Court has later observed in its opinion in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 , 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) '... the Fourth Amendment protects people not places.' Our opinion in Norman v. State, 379 So.2d 643 (Fla.Sup.Ct.1980) made it clear that fences and locked gates are evidence of the owner's or possessor's expectation of privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to position surveillance groups around the ranch's airfield, deputies were forced to cross a dike, ram through one gate and cut the chain lock on another, cut or cross posted fences, and proceed several hundred yards to their hiding places”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.