406 So. 2d 1246 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Witt v. State · 397 So. 2d 643 - State v. Sarmiento · 322 So. 2d 473 - Benyard v. Wainwright · 400 So. 2d 758 - Hoberman v. State · 377 So. 2d 755 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Does the rule of exclusion announced in State v. Sarmiento, 397 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1981), and Hoberman v. State, 400 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1981), provide grounds for post-conviction relief when raised for the first time in a Rule 3.850 proceeding by a defendant whose conviction became final before these decisions were filed?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Ideally, the retroactive effect of a decision changing constitutional doctrine is announced in the same decision. This is particularly important since the comment in Benyard ... that the Florida Supreme Court has the sole power to determine the retroactive effect of its decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.