Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 So. 2d 1314 - State v. Smith

406 So. 2d 1314 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 428 So. 2d 468 - State v. Guajardo (1983), State v. Williams (2003)

25 state decisions

1001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 352 So. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Clark v. Marullo · 383 So. 2d 1009 - State v. Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge refused, telling the defendant that he should pursue post-conviction relief. In March 1995, the defendant filed a motion to allow an out-of-time appeal, which was granted subsequent thereto and this appeal ensued. ISSUE ONE Law The Code of Criminal Procedure gives the trial judge the discretion to allow a guilty plea to be withdrawn at any time before sentencing. (La.Code Crim.P. art. 559(A)). The jurisprudence is clear that while the trial court has great discretion in allowing a guilty plea to be withdrawn,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acting pursuant to its post conviction jurisdiction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.