Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 SO2D 347 - Mitchell v. Moore

Mitchell v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 698 So. 2d 189 - Smith v. State (1996), 431 So. 2d 932 - Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co. (1983)

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

150198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kilcrease v. Harris · 397 So. 2d 98 - Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc. · Quillen v. Quillen · Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. Coleman · Foodtown Stores, Inc. v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'It must be shown that the expected evidence will be material and competent; there must be the probability that the testimony can be obtained at a future date to which the cause may be continued or postponed; due diligence must have been exercised by the movant to secure the absent witness or evidence; the expected evidence must be credible and will probably affect the result of the trial; it must not be merely cumulative or in the nature of impeachment; and the motion for continuance must not be made merely for purposes of delay.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'The collateral source doctrine ... provides that damages recoverable for a wrong are not diminished because the injured party has been wholly or partially indemnified or compensated for his loss by insurance effected by him and to which the wrongdoer did not contribute.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]s a general rule, the fact that the plaintiff received gratuitous medical care, continued salary or wage payments, proceeds from insurance policies, or welfare and pension benefits, will not be taken into account in computing damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.