Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 406 So. 2d 569 - State v. Johnson

406 So. 2d 569 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 425 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Telsee (1983), State v. Brogdon (1984)

50 state decisions

2501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holloway v. Arkansas · State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 398 So. 2d 1049 - State v. Jones · Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. It was manifest error of law for the Court to accept defendant's guilty plea without first properly determining that the defendant had full understanding of what the plea connotes and its consequences. 2. It was manifest error of law for the Court not to have properly inform defendant that the number of year(s) he would be sentenced to would be decided after receipt and review of his pre-sentence investigation report. 3. It was manifest error of law for the Court not to inquire of the defendant whether or not he plead guilty because he was lead to believe that he would receive a three (3) years suspended sentence. 4. It was manifest error of law for the Court not to allow defendant to withdraw his guilty plea after learning that the defendant's plea was made with the understanding and belief that he would receive a suspended sentence of not more than three years. 5. It was manifest error of law and evidence for the Court to refer to and rely on evidence not a part of the record in reaching its decision to deny defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “discretion to permit a guilty plea to be withdrawn is vested in the trial judge. That discretion, however, cannot be exercised arbitrarily.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.