¶1 ORDER
¶2Byron Ewing appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court did not clearly err in denying Ewing’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
¶3An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).