First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional Cuba’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
192 federal appellate · 21 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 426 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba (1983), Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba (1974)
192 federal appellate · 21 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedBanco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank of New York (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino · United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. · Oetjen v. Central Leather Co. · Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · Underhill v. Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 426 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]hat where the Executive Branch, charged as it is with primary responsibility for the conduct of foreign affairs, expressly represents to the Court that application of the act of state doctrine would not advance the interests of American foreign policy, that doctrine should not be applied by the courts. In so doing, we of course adopt and approve the so-called Bernstein exception to the act of state doctrine.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Every sovereign state is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign state, and the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory. Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“), which stated the Department's view that the act of state doctrine should not bar consideration of counterclaims in that case”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.