Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 B.R. 338 - Fee v. Eccles (In Re Eccles)

Fee v. Eccles (In Re Eccles)’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2013
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Field v. Mans · In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, Appellant · Thul v. Ophaug · First National Bank of Olathe v. Pontow

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.