In Re Wells’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2022
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1305 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Raleigh v. Illinois Department of Revenue · Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc. · In Re Burkett · In Re Parrish · eCast Settlement Corp. v. Tran (In Re Tran)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the purpose of giving the person receiving delivery the right to enforce the instrument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.