United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
407 F.2d 33 · 1969
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2001
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. · Laverick v. United States · United States v. Lucchese · Alvado v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * knowingly and voluntarily represented that “with fraudulent or unlawful intent” he caused to be transported in interstate commerce a falsely made and forged security knowing the security to have been falsely made and forged, (citations omitted) [and] appellant has precluded himself from now challenging the truthfulness of those admissions. 407 F.2d at 35 (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plea of guilty admits all facts well pleaded”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.