Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 F.2d 367 - Caton v. United States

Caton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

407 F.2d 367 · 1969

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
8
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably State v. Wolery (1976), Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance Company (1971)

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

46019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Griffin v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant had been fully informed of his rights. The statement was not elicited through trickery, misrepresentation or coercion. It was not even the product of an interrogation. < -x- -x- * Volunteered statements of any kind are not barred by the Fifth Amendment * * *.’ ” (Citation omitted.) ( 407 F.2d at 374 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.