Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued at Christiansted January 30, 1969.

Decided February 6, 1969.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-02-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Marchetti v. United States · Grosso v. United States · Wilson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1969-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 1993 · most notably Cupp v. Commissioner (1975), United States v. Johnson (1978)

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Paul E. M. Iasigi, pro se.

Britain H. Bryant, Christiansted, V. I., for appellee.

Before FREEDMAN, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,143.24 and an attorney's fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.

¶2

The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion which it could not say was clearly erroneous. 6 V.I. 352.

¶3

We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of the District Court.