United States v. Lipowitz’s Empirical Analysis
407 F.2d 597 · 1969
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently September 1995 · most notably United States v. Addonizio (1971), United States v. Somers (1974)
50 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Wade · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it was not disputed that proceedings other than [the defendant's] arraignment were taking place while [the witnesses] were in the courtroom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(h)ad (the defendant) been named in (the codefendant's) statements . . ., the principles enunciated in (Bruton ) might be applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not mention (the defendant) by name Or say anything which would implicate him in the robbery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.