Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 F.2d 715 - George Truitt Newell v. Paul R. Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy

George Truitt Newell v. Paul R. Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy’s Empirical Analysis

407 F.2d 715 · 1969

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
March 1987
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 1987

20 federal appellate ·

170196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From this statement of the Navy Department and from the representation of the Government at argument, we conclude that the Navy is fully prepared and willing, if indeed it has not already done so, to take all necessary actions to expunge all references which in any way allude to 'disloyalty' or 'security.' We therefore accept the Government's representation that these steps will be consummated forthwith if that has not already been done; Government counsel will promptly confirm these representations by appropriate communication to this court. 40 "So ordered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Seaman Newell's loyalty is not questioned. * * * [T]here is no basis to allege that Seaman Newell is a security risk.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “harsh impact such statements could have on appellant's future”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.