Loeb v. Hammond’s Empirical Analysis
407 F.2d 779 · 1969
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2009
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hiltpold v. Stern · McBean v. Fox · 88 Ill. App. 2d 383 - Bliesener v. Baird & Warner, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question of interpretation of the contract is for the jury and the question of legal effect is for the judge. In neither case do we permit expert testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n a civil suit based on fraud, the reputation of the defendant is not in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“________ being first duly sworn upon oath deposes and says,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.