Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 F.3d 573 - In Re: Pamela Knapper,

In Re: Pamela Knapper,’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
February 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP (2010), Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall) (2006)

2 federal appellate · 9 district ·

610200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 506

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Pegram v. Herdrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) if the claim was actually litigated in state court prior to the filing of the federal action; or (2) if the claim is inextricably intertwined with the state adjudication.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] federal claim is inextricably intertwined with an issue adjudicated by a state court when ... the federal court must take an action that would negate the state court’s judgment.... Rook-er-Feldman does not allow a plaintiff to seek relief that, if granted, would prevent a state court from enforcing its orders.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bankruptcy courts are empowered to avoid state judgments, see, e.g. , 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 , 547, 548, 549 ; to modify them, see, e.g. , 11 U.S.C. §§ 1129 , 1325 ; and to discharge them, see, e.g. , 11 U.S.C. §§ 727 , 1141, 1328.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.