Interdigital Communications Corp. v. Nokia Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 202 · 9 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · Dalton v. Educational Testing Service · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bobker · DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. · 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]rejudgment interest is necessary to compensate . . . for the opportunity cost”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.