Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2023
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Simmons v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Matlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Petitioner ... contends that the detectives’ search was unlawful under Article 26 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. Though the language of Article 26 is not identical to the language of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, we have construed Article 26 as being in pari materia with the Fourth Amendment and have accepted as persuasive the Supreme Court’s construction of the Fourth Amendment. See Scott [v. State], [ 366 Md. 121 ] at 139 n. 2[, 782 A.2d 862 ] n. 2 [2001]; Godson v. State, 341 Md. 1 , 668 A.2d 22 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1203 , 116 S.Ct. 1704 , 134 L.Ed.2d 803 (1996); Gahan v. State, 290 Md. 310 , 430 A.2d 49 (1981). Our conclusion that petitioner’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated during the detectives’ investigation and subsequent search and seizure of the rental car, applies equally to petitioner’s Article 26 claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Fourth Amendment rights are personal in nature and may only be enforced by the person whose rights were infringed upon”); see also Fitzgerald v. State, 153 Md.App. 601, 659 , 837 A.2d 989 (2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.