Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 N.W.2d 581 - Mott v. State

Mott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
15
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 143 Ill. 2d 61 - People v. Huante (1991), People v. Pozo (1987)

27 state decisions — followed in 15 states

1001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ng Fung Ho v. White · Gooding v. United States · Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan · Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent Institution

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “from the plea, the plea may be held invalid. Saadiq, 387 N.W.2d at 324-25 . If, on the other hand, the fallout from the plea is”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While there is some merit in the argument that deportation is such a serious consequence of the plea that it is more akin to a direct result, we adhere to our rule that failure to advise a defendant concerning collateral consequences, even serious ones, cannot provide a basis for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To hold, ... that a level of normal competency by an attorney requires anticipation and research of all possible collateral consequences, even “serious” ones, expects too much.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.