Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 80 Okla. Crim. 159 - Graham v. State · 8 Okla. Crim. 342 - Fritz v. State · Music v. State · 35 Okla. Crim. 352 - Howington v. State · 68 Okla. Crim. 147 - Morris v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘It is the duty of counsel to raise, at proper time and in proper manner, all objections to the proceedings and save proper exceptions. When this is not done, they are treated as waived, and there are few exceptions to this rule.’ ””
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kite v. State · Lung v. State““All persons concerned in the commission of crime, whether it be felony or misdemeanor, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense or aid and abet in its commission, are principals.” Title 21, O.S.A. § 172.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.