Albrecht v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · 59 So. 2d 40 - Gordon v. Gordon · 399 So. 2d 1374 - Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc. · 21 Ala. App. 530 - Crute v. State · Hay v. Salisbury
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Wjhen administrative agency action in a proceeding has become final as to a party, whether or not review by a district court of appeal is sought, that party is foreclosed from asserting in circuit court that the agency action is unconstitutional (or is improper for any other reason). This is for the simple reason that the unconstitutionality of the action is an issue which could have been asserted by the party on direct review by the district court of appeal pursuant to Section 120.68.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.