407 So. 2d 321 - Morales v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably State v. Mollica (1989), 105 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Bradley (1986)
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1401 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1581 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Although the challenge does not come too late, we are precluded by law from deciding the issue in the state's favor without first remanding the cause to the trial court for the purpose of developing a complete record on the standing issue the theory being that the issue was not fully litigated below, absent a proper state challenge, and that the defendants may have standing evidence which they were lulled into not presenting below and could present upon remand." 407 So.2d at 326 (footnote omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Any officer of the customs may at any time go on board of any vessel or vehicle at any place in the United States or within the customs waters ... and examine the manifest and other documents and papers and examine, inspect, and search the vessel or vehicle and every part thereof and any person, trunk, package, or cargo on board, and to this end may hail and stop such vessel or vehicle and use all necessary force to compel compliance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Doyle“A traveler crosses the international border of the United States by vessel at sea when he crosses from the high seas into the United States territorial sea at a point three nautical miles from the U.S. coast; stated differently, the three mile limit, as thus defined represents the international border of the United States for border search purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.