Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 407 So. 2d 659 - State v. Elliot

407 So. 2d 659 - State v. Elliot’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Scales (1995), State v. Wells (2010)

25 state decisions

1501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 290 So. 2d 681 - State v. Paciera · State v. Fauria · 381 So. 2d 420 - State v. Tomasetti · 339 So. 2d 755 - State v. Clift · State v. Morvant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Art. 213. Arrest by officer without warrant; when lawful A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person when: (1) The person to be arrested has committed an offense in his presence; and if the arrest is for a misdemeanor,1 it must be made immediately or on close pursuit; (2) The person to be arrested has committed a felony, although not in the presence of the officer; (3) The peace officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed an offense, although not in the presence of the officer; or (4) The peace officer has received positive and reliable information that another peace officer from this state holds an arrest warrant, or a peace officer of another state or the United States holds an arrest warrant for a felony offense. A peace officer in close pursuit of a person to be arrested, who is making an arrest pursuant to this Article may enter another jurisdiction in this state and make the arrest. Amended by Acts 1972, No. 646, § 1; Acts 1981, No. 613, § 1.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.