Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 F.2d 16 - J. Bryant Kasey and Mary Ann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a Corporation

J. Bryant Kasey and Mary Ann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

408 F.2d 16 · 1969

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably In re Volkswagen of America, Inc. (2008), Filmline Productions Inc v. United Artists Corporation (1989)

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2201969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Norwood v. Kirkpatrick · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · United States v. Bell Aircraft Corp. · Shapiro v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The scope of a mandamus proceeding must be narrowly maintained else the same impediments to justice and disservices to litigants produced by the appeal of an interlocutory order would be present without compelling countervailing considerations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “considered the issues listed in 1404(a) and * * * made his decision accordingly,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.