Collier v. Bayer’s Empirical Analysis
408 F.3d 1279 · 2005
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Estelle v. McGuire · Bousley v. United States · Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. · Ford v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal courts of appealfs] may not review state courts' interpretations of state law.''). 28 . See Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43 , 58 n. 11, 117 S.Ct. 1055 , 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997); see also Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 , 375-76, 113 S.Ct. 838 , 122 L.Ed.2d 180 (1993) (Thomas, J., concurring) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Musladin v. Lamarque
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.