United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
408 F.3d 301 · 2005
Citation profile
154
cited by 154 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited
72 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Webb · United States v. One Star
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the reasonableness of a variation from that range.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have now split our reasonableness review into two inquiries: procedural reasonableness and substantive reasonableness. A sentence may be procedurally unreasonable if “the district judge fails to ‘consider’ the applicable Guidelines range or neglects to ‘consider’ the other factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), and instead simply selects what the judge deems an appropriate sentence without such required consideration.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“address[ing] these provisions and decid[ing] what weight, if any, to afford them in light of Booker. " This court's decision in Davis, issued after we heard oral argument, likewise acknowledged that, "[i]n an appropriate case,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.