Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 F.3d 390 - Opsteen v. Keller Structures, Inc.

Opsteen v. Keller Structures, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

408 F.3d 390 · 2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp. · Chevron Inc v. Echazabal · Byrne v. Avon Products, Inc. · Pals v. Schepel Buick & GMC Truck, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ontradictions are unacceptable: a person who applied for disability benefits must live with the factual representations made to obtain them, and if these show inability to do the job then an ADA claim my be rejected without further inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.